Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Interactions between plant extracts and eell viability indicators during cytotoxicity testing: Implications for ethnopharmacological studies

Sze Mun Chan1, Kong Soo Khoo2, Nam Weng Sit1

1Department of Biomedical Science; 2Department of Chemical Science, Faculty of Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak, Malaysia.

For correspondence:-  Nam Sit   Email: sitnw@utar.edu.my   Tel:+6054688888

Received: 26 September 2014        Accepted: 27 August 2015        Published: 29 November 2015

Citation: Chan SM, Khoo KS, Sit NW. Interactions between plant extracts and eell viability indicators during cytotoxicity testing: Implications for ethnopharmacological studies. Trop J Pharm Res 2015; 14(11):1991-1998 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v14i10.6

© 2015 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the cytotoxicity of six medicinal plants (Acmella ciliata, Amaranthus tricolor, Coriandrum sativum, Glebionis coronaria, Kyllinga brevifolia and Tradescantia zebrina) using 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and neutral red uptake (NRU) assays.
Methods: Hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, ethanol, methanol and water extracts were obtained for each plant by sequential solvent extraction. Cytotoxicity was evaluated in triplicate, from 640 to 5 µg/mL, two-fold, serially on monkey kidney epithelial (Vero) cells.
Results: The hexane, chloroform and ethyl acetate extracts of the six plants were more toxic to the Vero cells compared to the ethanol, methanol and water extracts. Thirty one percent (11/36) and 75 % (27/36) of the extracts showed significant cytotoxicity (p < 0.05) in MTT and NRU assays, respectively. The 78, 52 and 7 % cytotoxicity levels detected in 27 extracts using the MTT assay were significantly (p < 0.05) underestimated at 640, 320 and 160 µg/mL, respectively, using NRU assay. Nine extracts from five plants exhibited significantly lower (p < 0.05) 50 % cytotoxic concentration (CC50) when NRU assay was employed compared to MTT assay.  At 640 µg/mL, 10 of the 21 extracts were also found to react chemically with MTT, causing a 2.0 – 29.1-fold increase in the absorbance value (550 nm) compared to control.
Conclusion: The plant extracts of A. ciliata, A. tricolor, C. sativum, G. coronaria, K. brevifolia and T. zebrina show concentration- and extraction method-dependent cytotoxicity using MTT and NRU assays. NRU assay appears to be more sensitive and reliable than MTT assay for cell viability evaluation of the plant extracts.

Keywords: Acmella ciliata, Amaranthus tricolor, Coriandrum sativum, Glebionis coronaria, Kyllinga brevifolia and Tradescantia zebrina, Extraction, Medicinal pla

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates